0

TODAY'S TIMES

BORROWED OPINIONS
THE HEALTH AND WEALTH OF A NATION SHOULD BE MEASURED AT IT'S BASE, NOT IT'S APEX. ~TRACY
IT'S TIME TO TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY, BY FIGHTING THE RAMPANT AND EXTREME MATERIALISM THAT IS SHATTERING OUR SOCIETY.

Consumers Take a Break

Consumer spending has been the powerful and dependable engine of the current economic expansion. Americans have continued to shop through boom-time borrowing, high oil prices, on-and-off job growth, uncontrolled medical costs, rampant trade deficits, hurricanes and war.

Until last month, that is.

Major American retailers reported April sales declines that were among the worst on record. The pain was widespread, including discounters, department stores and specialty shops. Wal-Mart, the nation’s largest retailer, had the steepest decline since it began reporting monthly figures 28 years ago. Government retail figures for April confirmed the slump, showing the first decline in seven months.

Clearly, consumers are squeezed as gas prices rise and wage growth slows, and as declining home prices make it harder to borrow against the house. It seems that conditions will worsen before they improve. When the initial reading on first-quarter economic growth clocked in last month at a weak 1.3 percent, there was a lot of talk about possible upward revisions in the months to come. Since then, news of a worse-than-expected trade imbalance has made a downward revision more likely. That would put economic activity well below the pace that’s needed for jobs and incomes to grow.

If consumers retrenched in earnest, a recession would be all but inevitable. The severity would be anybody’s guess, but two consequences would seem unavoidable. First, a consumer-led recession here could harm other economies as well, because spending by Americans accounts for a stunning 20 percent of the global economy. So far, as the American economy has slowed, the rest of the world has surged. But until last month, the slowdown in the United States was due mainly to the downturn in housing, not in consumer spending.

The other implication is political. A recession would be most painful for people who have benefited the least from the current expansion. That fact would force politicians to articulate an economic agenda that breaks with Bush-era policies — on health care, income inequality and social spending.

Rox said:
 
Bush's government may be able to spend like a sailor on leave, but the rest of us are forced to cut out not only things we want, but things we need as well. If I spent like the group in power does now, I'd be sitting here without electricity, and my stomach would be rumbling.

Gas prices are killers for most people right now, and I don't expect them to get better. It'll be a huge surprise if we ever see $2 a gallon gas again, let alone $1.

 
posted 922 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 
Vaughn Tolle said:
 
Rox, I'll be greatly surprised if we see $2.50 per gallon gas again. Maybe we shouldn't, as this would accelerate the demands of the public on political types to really do something concerning alternative energy.

Speaking of the economy, I see Daimler has sold Chrysler. Without going into the union-busting that surely will be tried, the interesting note to me is that Daimler paid 37.5 Billion for Chrysler, and the sale price is 7 Billion.
 
posted 922 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 
 
GREEN IS THE NEW RED WHITE AND BLUE
TRASHING THE PLANET IS DAMNED AMERICAN
WE NEED TO CHANGE THAT
 
posted 922 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 
Vaughn Tolle said:
 
I'm wondering if we are beginning to see the natural folly of "guns and butter" economics. Bear with me a bit, as I am formulating this on the fly.

The late days of the Nixon Administration, followed by the Ford Administration and the Carter Administration, were marked with rising inflation, stagnant economy, etc., which I felt at the time and continue to believe were caused by the "guns and butter" approach to VietNam. During those times, spending (militarily and domestically) continued to rise to the point that eventually, something had to give. Each of us who are old enough recall the 18% mortgages, 21% certificates of deposit, etc., with inflation raging away. The economy was stagnant, as the only "growth" occurred from military spending and the domestic policies instituted by the Johnson administration. Price controls were tried by President Nixon, to no success. Gerald Ford was infamous for his WIN (Whip Inflation Now) button. President Carter tried to encourage energy conservation, to little success.

At present, we have a costly military adventure ongoing, most of which is "off budget". There have been tax cuts. Post-9/11, there have been large layoffs, megamergers, squeezing all productivity possible from the remaining workforce. We are told that to be good Americans, we need to keep living life as we had, don't worry about economic sacrifices. The housing boom allowed many to tap the artificial equity built into the value of their homes. This is now over, and as the realities of the refis come home to roost, wages haven't risen to allow the higher payments on the mortgages to be made.

Much like what happened during the 1970s, and particularly the late 1970s, energy prices are on the rise. This affects all of us, whether in the price of commuting, increased costs for groceries due to increased transportation costs, and the cost of basic commodities themselves due to the Ethanol boom driving the cost of corn up. There are surely other examples, but those come to mind easily.

The low hanging fruit of increased productivity from the work force has been harvested. What lies ahead is a painful retrenchment of the economy, as the ability of the consumer to spend and keep us out of recession has reached its limit. I foresee even more "outsourcing" of jobs, increased layoffs, etc., as companies work hard to reduce costs to generate larger dividends to their shareholders to avoid litigation. If we're lucky, we won't approach the stagflation of the late 1970s and early 1980s; I'm not sure we'll be lucky.
 
posted 922 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 

Search