0

TODAY'S TIMES

BORROWED OPINIONS
May 16, 2007
Editorial

Bringing Lobbyists to Heel

It’s crunch time for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to deliver on the Democrats’ vow to rein in power lobbyists who sully Congress by purchasing privileged access with outsized campaign donations. There are worthy remedies, but members are balking. If the House resorts to mere cosmetic changes, the Democrats will risk the same voters’ ire that cost the Republicans control last year.

The keystone of lobbying reform has already been passed by the Senate: the requirement that lobbyists disclose details of how they buy insiders’ clout — think Jack Abramoff — by soliciting donations from countless clients and delivering them to grateful lawmakers in eye-popping megabundles. The House must match the Senate in requiring full disclosure of these bundling operations and full details of who gives what to whom at pay-per-view fundraising galas that are the staple of Washington’s social life.

Credible reform also demands that lobbying firms, which now must disclose their accounts inside Washington, be forced to report on their out-of-town “grass-roots” campaigns. These are expensive, highly sophisticated operations disguised as spontaneous local movements, aimed at stirring the public to lobby Congress. The House should ban outright another wile of professional lobbyists: bankrolling lavish parties to “honor” (read “buy”) political leaders at the national party conventions.

The final target in credible reform is restraining the rush of members to become lobbyists through that golden revolving door to K Street. The present one-year quarantine must be doubled to two years during which alumni must avoid all lobbying, and not just direct contact but also the behind-the-scenes strategizing that is a current loophole.

Make no mistake. If the leadership fails to bring the lobbying industry to heel, voters will know that Congress remains as much for sale under the Democrats as it was under the Republicans.

 
All you Dems out there needa remind 'em we're watchin'.
 
posted 920 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 
Vaughn Tolle said:
 
We all should remind them all we're watching. I still wonder if limiting campaign contributions to "natural persons" with immediate public disclosure of the identity of the donor on a third-party web site might not work to limit the influence of the K Street folks.

If Y'all are wondering about the "natural persons" thing, this is due to an old SCOTUS opinion holding corporations are "persons" within the meaning of the Constitution. Thus, "natural persons", i.e., ones who may actually register to and vote (whether they choose to so do or not).
 
posted 920 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 
 
Did not know that VT.
That means that Larry Flint's Hustler corporation is a natural person?
Wow.
Ain't democracy wonderful.
 
posted 920 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 
Vaughn Tolle said:
 
No, Tracy, Larry Flynt's Hustler corporation is a "person" but not a "natural person". BTW, should you or anyone else have insomnia, use the search engine of your choice with the term "substantive due process". You might be amazed.
 
posted 920 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 

Search