0

MinutemanMedia.org

BORROWED OPINIONS

THE STENCH OF CORPORATE WELFARE – by Jim Hightower

Big corporations seems to be doing awfully well these days, scooping up record profits, getting massive tax breaks from the federal government, and cutting back on their employees. They're wallowing in wealth!

So, I ask you: Why do our cities and states keep funneling billions of dollars worth of corporate welfare to them every year? Governors, legislators, and mayors wail that they don't have the funds for such basics as schools, health care, and potholes... yet they try to out-do each other in offering the fattest tax breaks to the richest entities in our land.

Texas is one of the worst. My state routinely opens our public treasury in a whorish effort to attract corporate greedheads to move here. Now, a bill in the legislature would throw our tax dollars at even more of these roving corporate thrill seekers. And, get this: to make Texas even more alluring, the bill lowers the state's wage standards, allowing these giants to grab our favors while cutting the wages they must pay nearly in half!

This thing is stinkier than a skunk farm, yet the sponsors try to perfume it with the old flim-flam that the tax giveaways will create: JOBS! There's one little flaw in that promise: No state agency even audits the giveaway program! So no one knows whether the promised jobs are ever delivered or whether the corporations pay anywhere near middle-class wages.

Add to this absurdity another one, which is that nearly all corporations admit that they really don't base their relocation decisions on whether or not they get a juicy tax break. Things like an area's weather, life style, cultural offerings, education, and job skills are more important.

Of all the crying needs that states and cities should be funding, corporate welfare is dead last.

To learn how you can help stop these shameful giveaways,

call Good Jobs First: (202) 232-1616 or goodjobsfirst.org.

 
 
posted 919 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 
Vaughn Tolle said:
 
Sadly, it is my opinion that the reason the corporations list tax breaks, incentives, whatever as not important is that it is a given the same will be provided irrespective of the location to which the operations will be moved.
 
posted 919 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 
Vaughn Tolle said:
 
To add a bit to my upthread post. As the tax breaks are now an expected part of any deal, the corporation will identify two or three areas which meet its other criteria having a higher priority, then use the tax breaks offered as a bargaining chip in determining the final siting of the operation in question.
 
posted 919 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 
rm6046 said:
 
Jim Hightower has been a rabble-rouser in Texas since the seventies, but, as the old saying goes, even a blind pig can find an acorn now and then. I've got to give him this one, for sure. IMHO, corporations seeking tax breaks, etc., for location or relocation to a specific area should be allocated on a performance basis, i.e. $X for each new job created, audited on an annual basis ... if they are going to be given at all.
 
posted 919 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 
lindainks55 said:
 

Hi rm! Sure good to "read" you.
 
posted 919 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 
rm6046 said:
 
Hi Linda !!
 
posted 919 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 

Search