0

TODAY'S TIMES

BORROWED OPINIONS

Evolution and Texas

Is Texas about to become the next state to undermine the teaching of evolution? That is the scary implication of the abrupt ousting of Christine Comer, the state’s top expert on science education. Her transgression: forwarding an e-mail message about a talk by a distinguished professor who debunks “intelligent design” and creationism as legitimate alternatives to evolution in the science curriculum.

In most states, we hope, the state department of education would take the lead in ensuring that students receive a sound scientific education. But it was the Texas Education Agency that pushed out Ms. Comer after 27 years as a science teacher and 9 years as the agency’s director of science.

As Ralph Blumenthal reported in The Times yesterday, Ms. Comer forwarded to a local online community an e-mail message from a pro-evolution group announcing a talk by Barbara Forrest, a professor of philosophy at Southeastern Louisiana University. Professor Forrest testified as an expert witness in a 2005 Dover, Pa., case that found intelligent design supernatural and theological and definitely not part of a scientific education.

An hour later, Ms. Comer was called in by superiors, pressured to send out a retraction and ultimately forced to resign. Her departure was instigated by a new deputy commissioner who had served as an adviser to George Bush when he was governor of Texas and more recently worked in the federal Department of Education.

It was especially disturbing that the agency accused Ms. Comer — by forwarding the e-mail message — of taking a position on “a subject on which the agency must remain neutral.” Surely the agency should not remain neutral on the central struggle between science and religion in the public schools. It should take a stand in favor of evolution as a central theory in modern biology. Texas’s own education standards require the teaching of evolution.

Those standards are scheduled to be reviewed next year. Ms. Comer’s dismissal and comments in favor of intelligent design by the chairman of the state board of education do not augur well for that review. We can only hope that adherents of a sound science education can save Texas from a retreat into the darker ages.

Vaughn Tolle said:
 
Well, well; losing a job because an email was forwarded. Politics once again at work.

The actions of the Texas state board of education should sound alarm bells; one somewhat connected issue to be remembered is that three states (Texas, Florida and California) drive textbook content, given the purchasing power of those states as at least in Texas, purchasing textbooks for state schools is done at the state level, and subject to the approval of a committee. If Texas determines that the non-science based hypotheses of creationism and intelligent design are to be included in "science" textbooks in Texas, these will appear in textbooks nation wide.

For those who may lurk; the alleged "controversy" over the scientific theory of evolution may be taught, if one will, by a critical and thorough examination of the scientific method, without bringing in the nonscience of intelligent design and creationism. To the extent creation stories are to be taught, a class in world cultures could well examine all creation myths; a class in comparative religion could deal with various views of creation from the perspective of world religions. Interesting study, but not science (as none of these are falsifiable).
 
posted 718 days ago
Add Comment Reply to: this comment OR this thread
 

Search